linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:21:27 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 15

On 10/15/2013 07:02 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> repository below:
>
>          git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
>
> A next-20131015 tag is also provided for convenience.
>
> Gained a new conflict, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default
> configurations build fine. I've also used an x86 allmodconfig build to
> check for build errors. Mark fixed most of those in the trees that he
> created last Thursday and Friday, so I've cherry-picked them on top of
> the final merge. There was one new build failure in the staging tree
> that was trivial to fix so I added a patch to the tree as well.
>

This build does look much better than the previous ones. I 'only' get 12 build failures
out of 106 configurations. Worst are powerpc builds, with 7 out of 14 builds failed.

Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders; look for the 'next' column.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/