linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131016095030.GA8954@gchen.bj.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:50:30 -0400
From:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, m.chehab@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:35PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:24:35 +0530
> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
>  linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, m.chehab@...sung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> 
> On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
> > Use trace interface to elaborate all H/W error related
> > information.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> <snip>
> > +TRACE_EVENT(extlog_mem_event,
> > +	TP_PROTO(u32 etype,
> > +		char *dimm_loc,
> > +		const uuid_le *fru_id,
> > +		char *fru_text,
> > +		u64 error_count,
> > +		u32 severity,
> > +		u64 phy_addr,
> > +		char *mem_loc),
> 
> [Adding Mauro...]
> 
> This looks very similar to the trace event I wrote a while back,
> which was similar to the one provided by ghes_edac:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/24616
> 
> Seems to me this has the same issues we previously discussed w.r.t
> EDAC conflicts...
> 
This thread is so long. I have to say I'm lost ...
Anyway, it looks like there are many different opnions on this last
patch. I will send the 2nd version for further discussion soon.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)