[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016103751.GA24897@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:37:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, srostedt@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu
operations V4
* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> > That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the
> > patches a bit harder to review.
>
> I do not have any control over how my ISP sorts these emails. [...]
Your series from today has proper threading - so after all it _was_
possible for you to send a patch series correctly?
Note that you did not address the other problem that David Miller pointed
out, the Cc list still looks messed up:
Message-Id: <20131015180050.084352174@...ux.com>
User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:58:53 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...uxfoundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] net: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists