| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 01:54:51 +0000 From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> CC: "Ingo Molnar (mingo@...nel.org)" <mingo@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (peterz@...radead.org)" <peterz@...radead.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org' (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>, "Li, Zhuangzhi" <zhuangzhi.li@...el.com> Subject: RE: Panic and page fault in loop during handling NMI backtrace handler Hello Steven, > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@...dmis.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:40 AM > To: Liu, Chuansheng > Cc: Ingo Molnar (mingo@...nel.org); hpa@...or.com; fweisbec@...il.com; > akpm@...ux-foundation.org; paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; Peter Zijlstra > (peterz@...radead.org); x86@...nel.org; 'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org' > (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org); Wang, Xiaoming; Li, Zhuangzhi > Subject: Re: Panic and page fault in loop during handling NMI backtrace handler > > > BTW, please do not send out HTML email, as that gets blocked from going > to LKML. Thanks your reminder, I forgot to convert it into txt email. > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 02:01:04 +0000 > "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> wrote: > > > We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in the > NMI handler arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler, > > It hit the PAGE fault, then PAGE fault is in loop, at last the thread stack > overflow, and system panic. > > > > Anyone can give some help? Thanks. > > > > > > Panic log as below: > > =============== > > [ 15.069144] BUG: unable to handle kernel [ 15.073635] paging request > at 1649736d > > [ 15.076379] IP: [<c200402a>] print_context_stack+0x4a/0xa0 > > [ 15.082529] *pde = 00000000 > > [ 15.085758] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted > > [ 15.091303] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > > [ 15.094932] Modules linked in: atomisp_css2400b0_v2(+) lm3554 ov2722 > imx1x5 atmel_mxt_ts vxd392 videobuf_vmalloc videobuf_core bcm_bt_lpm > bcm43241 kct_daemon(O) > > [ 15.111093] CPU: 2 PID: 2443 Comm: Compiler Tainted: G W O > 3.10.1+ #1 > > I'm curious, what "Out-of-tree" module was loaded? We have some un-upstream modules indeed:) > > Read the rest from the bottom up, as that's how I wrote it :-) > > > > [ 15.119075] task: f213f980 ti: f0c42000 task.ti: f0c42000 > > [ 15.125116] EIP: 0060:[<c200402a>] EFLAGS: 00210087 CPU: 2 > > [ 15.131255] EIP is at print_context_stack+0x4a/0xa0 > > [ 15.136712] EAX: 16497ffc EBX: 1649736d ECX: 986736d8 EDX: 1649736d > > [ 15.143722] ESI: 00000000 EDI: ffffe000 EBP: f0c4220c ESP: f0c421ec > > [ 15.150732] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 003b SS: 0068 > > [ 15.156771] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 1649736d CR3: 31245000 CR4: > 001007d0 > > [ 15.163781] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: > 00000000 > > [ 15.170789] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > > [ 15.175076] Stack: > > [ 15.177324] 16497ffc 16496000 986736d8 ffffe000 986736d8 1649736d > c282c148 16496000 > > [ 15.186067] f0c4223c c20033b0 c282c148 c29ceecf 00000000 f0c4222c > 986736d8 f0c4222c > > [ 15.194810] 00000000 c29ceecf 00000000 00000000 f0c42260 > c20041a7 f0c4229c c282c148 > > [ 15.203549] Call Trace: > > [ 15.206295] [<c20033b0>] dump_trace+0x70/0xf0 > > [ 15.211274] [<c20041a7>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x47/0x60 > > [ 15.217028] [<c2003482>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x52/0xd0 > > [ 15.222782] [<c2004201>] show_stack+0x21/0x50 > > [ 15.227762] [<c281b38b>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 > > [ 15.232742] [<c2037cff>] warn_slowpath_common+0x5f/0x80 > > [ 15.238693] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 15.244156] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 15.249621] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 15.255472] [<c2037d3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 > > [ 15.261228] [<c282553a>] vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 15.266497] [<c282592f>] __do_page_fault+0x2cf/0x4a0 > > [ 15.272154] [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230 > > [ 15.278106] [<c2039c94>] ? console_unlock+0x314/0x440 > > ... // > > [ 16.885364] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 16.891217] [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10 > > [ 16.896387] [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60 > > [ 16.901367] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 16.907219] [<c208d6a0>] ? print_modules+0x20/0x90 > > [ 16.912685] [<c2037cfa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x5a/0x80 > > [ 16.918634] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 16.924097] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 16.929562] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 16.935415] [<c2037d3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 > > [ 16.941169] [<c282553a>] vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 16.946437] [<c282592f>] __do_page_fault+0x2cf/0x4a0 > > [ 16.952095] [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230 > > [ 16.958046] [<c2039c94>] ? console_unlock+0x314/0x440 > > [ 16.963800] [<c2003e62>] ? sys_modify_ldt+0x2/0x160 > > [ 16.969362] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 16.975215] [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10 > > [ 16.980386] [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60 > > [ 16.985366] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 16.991215] [<c208d6a0>] ? print_modules+0x20/0x90 > > [ 16.996673] [<c2037cfa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x5a/0x80 > > [ 17.002622] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 17.008086] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 17.013550] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.019403] [<c2037d3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 > > [ 17.025159] [<c282553a>] vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > Oh look, we are constantly warning about this same fault! There's your > infinite loop. Yes, it is the real WARN_ON infinite loop. > > Note the WARN_ON_ONCE() does the WARN_ON() first and then updates > __warned = true. Thus, if the WARN_ON() itself faults, then we are in > an infinite loop. > > > [ 17.030428] [<c282592f>] __do_page_fault+0x2cf/0x4a0 > > [ 17.036085] [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230 > > [ 17.042037] [<c2039c94>] ? console_unlock+0x314/0x440 > > [ 17.047790] [<c2003e62>] ? sys_modify_ldt+0x2/0x160 > > [ 17.053352] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.059205] [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10 > > [ 17.064375] [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60 > > [ 17.069354] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.075204] [<c208d6a0>] ? print_modules+0x20/0x90 > > [ 17.080669] [<c2037cfa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x5a/0x80 > > [ 17.086619] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 17.092082] [<c282553a>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > [ 17.097546] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.103399] [<c2037d3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 > > [ 17.109154] [<c282553a>] vmalloc_fault+0x5a/0xcf > > Yep, the WARN_ON() triggered in vmalloc_fault(). We shouldn't worry > about warning in_nmi() for vmalloc faults anymore. Got it. > > > > [ 17.114422] [<c282592f>] __do_page_fault+0x2cf/0x4a0 > > [ 17.120080] [<c206b93d>] ? update_group_power+0x1fd/0x240 > > [ 17.126224] [<c227827b>] ? number.isra.2+0x32b/0x330 > > [ 17.131880] [<c20679bc>] ? update_curr+0xac/0x190 > > [ 17.137247] [<c227827b>] ? number.isra.2+0x32b/0x330 > > [ 17.142905] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.148755] [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10 > > [ 17.153926] [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60 > > [ 17.158905] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0 > > [ 17.164760] [<c208d1a9>] ? module_address_lookup+0x29/0xb0 > > [ 17.170999] [<c208dddb>] kallsyms_lookup+0x9b/0xb0 > > Looks like kallsyms_lookup() faulted? > > > [ 17.176462] [<c208de1d>] __sprint_symbol+0x2d/0xd0 > > [ 17.181926] [<c22790cc>] ? sprintf+0x1c/0x20 > > [ 17.186804] [<c208def4>] sprint_symbol+0x14/0x20 > > [ 17.192063] [<c208df1e>] __print_symbol+0x1e/0x40 > > [ 17.197430] [<c25e00d7>] ? ashmem_shrink+0x77/0xf0 > > [ 17.202895] [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230 > > [ 17.208845] [<c205bdf5>] ? up+0x25/0x40 > > [ 17.213242] [<c2039cb7>] ? console_unlock+0x337/0x440 > > [ 17.218998] [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a > > [ 17.223782] [<c20006d0>] __show_regs+0x70/0x190 > > [ 17.228954] [<c200353a>] show_regs+0x3a/0x1b0 > > [ 17.233931] [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a > > [ 17.238717] [<c2824182>] > arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x62/0x80 > > [ 17.246413] [<c2823919>] nmi_handle.isra.0+0x39/0x60 > > [ 17.252071] [<c2823a29>] do_nmi+0xe9/0x3f0 > > Start here and read upward. > > Can you try this patch: > > From 794197cf3f563d36e5ee5b29cbf8e941163f9bc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org> > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:34:56 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove WARN_ON(in_nmi()) from vmalloc_fault > > Since the NMI iretq nesting has been fixed, there's no reason that I think you patch fix the infinite loop, we will have a test soon. BTW, we are using 3.10, could you help to point out which NMI iretq nesting patch? Thanks. > an NMI handler can not take a page fault for vmalloc'd code. No locks > are taken in that code path, and the software now handles nested NMIs > when the fault re-enables NMIs on iretq. > > Not only that, if the vmalloc_fault() WARN_ON_ONCE() is hit, and that > warn on triggers a vmalloc fault for some reason, then we can go into > an infinite loop (the WARN_ON_ONCE() does the WARN() before updating > the variable to make it happen "once"). > > Reported-by: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> > --- > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > index 3aaeffc..78926c6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > @@ -268,8 +268,6 @@ static noinline __kprobes int vmalloc_fault(unsigned > long address) > if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END)) > return -1; > > - WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()); > - > /* > * Synchronize this task's top level page-table > * with the 'reference' page table. > -- > 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists