| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:36:04 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <arjan@...ux.intel.com>, <linux@...ck-us.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: unify copy_from_user() checking
Commits 4a3127693001c61a21d1ce680db6340623f52e93 ("x86: Turn the
copy_from_user check into an (optional) compile time warning") and
63312b6a6faae3f2e5577f2b001e3b504f10a2aa ("x86: Add a Kconfig option to
turn the copy_from_user warnings into errors") touched only the 32-bit
variant of copy_from_user(), whereas the original commit
9f0cf4adb6aa0bfccf675c938124e68f7f06349d ("x86: Use
__builtin_object_size() to validate the buffer size for
copy_from_user()") also added the same code to the 64-bit one.
Further the earlier conversion from an inline WARN() to the call to
copy_from_user_overflow() went a little too far: When the number of
bytes to be copied is not a constant (e.g. [looking at 3.11] in
drivers/net/tun.c:__tun_chr_ioctl() or
drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_inject.c:aer_inject_write()), the compiler
will always have to keep the funtion call, and hence there will always
be a warning. By using __builtin_constant_p() we can avoid this.
Since the 32-bit variant (intentionally) didn't call might_fault(), the
unification results in this being called twice now. Adding a suitable
#ifdef would be the alternative if that's a problem.
I'd like to point out though that with __compiletime_object_size()
being restricted to gcc before 4.6, the whole construct is going to
become more and more pointless going forward. I would question
however that commit 2fb0815c9ee6b9ac50e15dd8360ec76d9fa46a2 ("gcc4:
disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+") was really necessary,
and instead this should have been dealt with as is done here from the
beginning.
It also puzzles me that similar checking isn't done for copy_to_user():
While not resulting in (kernel) buffer overflows, size mistakes there
would still lead to information leaks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 23 -----------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 16 ----------------
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--- 3.12-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ 3.12-rc5-x86-copy_from_user-overflow/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -542,5 +542,30 @@ extern struct movsl_mask {
# include <asm/uaccess_64.h>
#endif
+extern void copy_from_user_overflow(void)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
+ __compiletime_error("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
+#else
+ __compiletime_warning("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
+#endif
+;
+
+static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_from_user(void *to,
+ const void __user *from,
+ unsigned long n)
+{
+ int sz = __compiletime_object_size(to);
+
+ might_fault();
+ if (likely(sz == -1 || sz >= n))
+ n = _copy_from_user(to, from, n);
+ else if(__builtin_constant_p(n))
+ copy_from_user_overflow();
+ else
+ WARN(1, "Buffer overflow detected (%d < %lu)!\n", sz, n);
+
+ return n;
+}
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_UACCESS_H */
--- 3.12-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ 3.12-rc5-x86-copy_from_user-overflow/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -190,27 +190,4 @@ unsigned long __must_check _copy_from_us
const void __user *from,
unsigned long n);
-
-extern void copy_from_user_overflow(void)
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
- __compiletime_error("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
-#else
- __compiletime_warning("copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct")
-#endif
-;
-
-static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_from_user(void *to,
- const void __user *from,
- unsigned long n)
-{
- int sz = __compiletime_object_size(to);
-
- if (likely(sz == -1 || sz >= n))
- n = _copy_from_user(to, from, n);
- else
- copy_from_user_overflow();
-
- return n;
-}
-
#endif /* _ASM_X86_UACCESS_32_H */
--- 3.12-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ 3.12-rc5-x86-copy_from_user-overflow/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -52,22 +52,6 @@ _copy_from_user(void *to, const void __u
__must_check unsigned long
copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned len);
-static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_from_user(void *to,
- const void __user *from,
- unsigned long n)
-{
- int sz = __compiletime_object_size(to);
-
- might_fault();
- if (likely(sz == -1 || sz >= n))
- n = _copy_from_user(to, from, n);
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
- else
- WARN(1, "Buffer overflow detected!\n");
-#endif
- return n;
-}
-
static __always_inline __must_check
int copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists