lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:51:11 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>,
	"Li, Zhuangzhi" <zhuangzhi.li@...el.com>,
	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove WARN_ON(in_nmi()) from vmalloc_fault


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:11:18 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Since the NMI iretq nesting has been fixed, there's no reason that
> > > an NMI handler can not take a page fault for vmalloc'd code. No locks
> > > are taken in that code path, and the software now handles nested NMIs
> > > when the fault re-enables NMIs on iretq.
> > > 
> > > Not only that, if the vmalloc_fault() WARN_ON_ONCE() is hit, and that
> > > warn on triggers a vmalloc fault for some reason, then we can go into
> > > an infinite loop (the WARN_ON_ONCE() does the WARN() before updating
> > > the variable to make it happen "once").
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > 
> > Would be nice to see the warning quoted that triggered this.
> 
> Sure, want me to add this to the change log?

Yeah, that would be helpful - but only the stack trace portion I suspect, 
to make it clear what caused the fault.

The one posted in the thread shows:

[   17.148755]  [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10
[   17.153926]  [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60
[   17.158905]  [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0
[   17.164760]  [<c208d1a9>] ? module_address_lookup+0x29/0xb0
[   17.170999]  [<c208dddb>] kallsyms_lookup+0x9b/0xb0
[   17.186804]  [<c208def4>] sprint_symbol+0x14/0x20
[   17.192063]  [<c208df1e>] __print_symbol+0x1e/0x40
[   17.197430]  [<c25e00d7>] ? ashmem_shrink+0x77/0xf0
[   17.202895]  [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230
[   17.208845]  [<c205bdf5>] ? up+0x25/0x40
[   17.213242]  [<c2039cb7>] ? console_unlock+0x337/0x440
[   17.218998]  [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a
[   17.223782]  [<c20006d0>] __show_regs+0x70/0x190
[   17.228954]  [<c200353a>] show_regs+0x3a/0x1b0
[   17.233931]  [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a
[   17.238717]  [<c2824182>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x62/0x80
[   17.246413]  [<c2823919>] nmi_handle.isra.0+0x39/0x60
[   17.252071]  [<c2823a29>] do_nmi+0xe9/0x3f0

So kallsyms_lookup() faulted, while the NMI watchdog triggered a 
show_regs()? How is that possible?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ