[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016125111.GB2611@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:51:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>,
"Li, Zhuangzhi" <zhuangzhi.li@...el.com>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove WARN_ON(in_nmi()) from vmalloc_fault
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:11:18 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Since the NMI iretq nesting has been fixed, there's no reason that
> > > an NMI handler can not take a page fault for vmalloc'd code. No locks
> > > are taken in that code path, and the software now handles nested NMIs
> > > when the fault re-enables NMIs on iretq.
> > >
> > > Not only that, if the vmalloc_fault() WARN_ON_ONCE() is hit, and that
> > > warn on triggers a vmalloc fault for some reason, then we can go into
> > > an infinite loop (the WARN_ON_ONCE() does the WARN() before updating
> > > the variable to make it happen "once").
> > >
> > > Reported-by: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > Would be nice to see the warning quoted that triggered this.
>
> Sure, want me to add this to the change log?
Yeah, that would be helpful - but only the stack trace portion I suspect,
to make it clear what caused the fault.
The one posted in the thread shows:
[ 17.148755] [<c2825b08>] do_page_fault+0x8/0x10
[ 17.153926] [<c2823066>] error_code+0x5a/0x60
[ 17.158905] [<c2825b00>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4a0/0x4a0
[ 17.164760] [<c208d1a9>] ? module_address_lookup+0x29/0xb0
[ 17.170999] [<c208dddb>] kallsyms_lookup+0x9b/0xb0
[ 17.186804] [<c208def4>] sprint_symbol+0x14/0x20
[ 17.192063] [<c208df1e>] __print_symbol+0x1e/0x40
[ 17.197430] [<c25e00d7>] ? ashmem_shrink+0x77/0xf0
[ 17.202895] [<c25e13e0>] ? logger_aio_write+0x230/0x230
[ 17.208845] [<c205bdf5>] ? up+0x25/0x40
[ 17.213242] [<c2039cb7>] ? console_unlock+0x337/0x440
[ 17.218998] [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a
[ 17.223782] [<c20006d0>] __show_regs+0x70/0x190
[ 17.228954] [<c200353a>] show_regs+0x3a/0x1b0
[ 17.233931] [<c2818236>] ? printk+0x38/0x3a
[ 17.238717] [<c2824182>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x62/0x80
[ 17.246413] [<c2823919>] nmi_handle.isra.0+0x39/0x60
[ 17.252071] [<c2823a29>] do_nmi+0xe9/0x3f0
So kallsyms_lookup() faulted, while the NMI watchdog triggered a
show_regs()? How is that possible?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists