[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000141c1e16001-26ccfd98-51ee-4ca6-8ddf-61abd491dea8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:27:54 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] slab: correct pfmemalloc check
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,8 @@ static void *__ac_put_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac,
> {
> if (unlikely(pfmemalloc_active)) {
> /* Some pfmemalloc slabs exist, check if this is one */
> - struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
> + struct slab *slabp = virt_to_slab(objp);
> + struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(slabp->s_mem);
> if (PageSlabPfmemalloc(page))
I hope the compiler optimizes this code correctly because virt_to_slab
already does one virt_to_head_page()?
Otherwise this looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists