[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525EBA5F.5080608@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:10:07 -0700
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"gnurou@...il.com" <gnurou@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpiolib: add gpiod_get() and gpiod_put() functions
On 10/16/2013 04:37 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
>>> +#else
>>> +static struct device_node *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *id
>>> + unsigned int idx, unsigned long flags)
>>> +{
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>
>> ... and of course I forgot to fix the main compilation error. Linus,
>> would you mind squashing what follows into this patch? Apologies for
>> the inconvenience.
>
> I guess you'll fix this if you respin it?
>
> If it's too much trouble now we can just defer this for early in the v3.14
> cycle.
No problem, I will try to rebase on top of your for-next, and squash
this today.
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists