lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:39:26 -0700
From:	Tim Gardner <timg@....com>
To:	Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@...il.com>
CC:	linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
	samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 linux-next] cifs: Make big endian multiplex ID sequences
 monotonic on the wire

On 10/16/2013 09:25 AM, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Tim Gardner <timg@....com> wrote:
>> The multiplex identifier (MID) in the SMB header is only
>> ever used by the client, in conjunction with PID, to match responses
>> from the server. As such, the endianess of the MID is not important.
>> However, When tracing packet sequences on the wire, protocol analyzers
>> such as wireshark display MID as little endian. It is much more informative
>> for the on-the-wire MID sequences to match debug information emitted by the
>> CIFS driver.  Therefore, one should write and read MID in the SMB header
>> assuming it is always little endian.
>>
>> Observed from wireshark during the protocol negotiation
>> and session setup:
>>
>>         Multiplex ID: 256
>>         Multiplex ID: 256
>>         Multiplex ID: 512
>>         Multiplex ID: 512
>>         Multiplex ID: 768
>>         Multiplex ID: 768
>>
>> After this patch on-the-wire MID values begin at 1 and increase monotonically.
>>
>> Introduce get_next_mid64() for the internal consumers that use the full 64 bit
>> multiplex identifier.
>>
>> Introduce the helpers get_mid() and compare_mid() to make the endian
>> translation clear.
>>
>> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <timg@....com>
>> ---
>>
>> I'm looking at some of this code in excrutiating detail because I'm having trouble
>> with a backport of CIFS from 3.9.7 on an embedded 2.6.31 powerpc. Its failing the RawNTLMSSP
>> authentication and is almost certainly an endian issue. x86 on the same code base works
>> quite well. Am I making a rash assumption that CIFS in 3.9 stable worked on big endian ?
> 
> Do you have this commit  fdf96a907c1fbb93c633e2b7ede3b8df26d6a4c0 ?
> This might help if you do not have it in your code base.
> 

Yep - I found that one pretty early on. It solved a powerpc issue with
session startup to an x86 Linux CIFS server. The current failing session
startup is to an Apple 10.8.5 (Lion) server (serverNOS=@(#)PROGRAM:smbd
 PROJECT:smbx-136.20.1).

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner timg@....com www.tpi.com
OR 503-601-0234 x102 MT 406-443-5357
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ