lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:44:51 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [ 42/69] ipc/sem.c: cacheline align the semaphore structures

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>

commit f5c936c0f267ec58641451cf8b8d39b4c207ee4d upstream.

As now each semaphore has its own spinlock and parallel operations are
possible, give each semaphore its own cacheline.

On a i3 laptop, this gives up to 28% better performance:

  #semscale 10 | grep "interleave 2"
  - before:
  Cpus 1, interleave 2 delay 0: 36109234 in 10 secs
  Cpus 2, interleave 2 delay 0: 55276317 in 10 secs
  Cpus 3, interleave 2 delay 0: 62411025 in 10 secs
  Cpus 4, interleave 2 delay 0: 81963928 in 10 secs

  -after:
  Cpus 1, interleave 2 delay 0: 35527306 in 10 secs
  Cpus 2, interleave 2 delay 0: 70922909 in 10 secs <<< + 28%
  Cpus 3, interleave 2 delay 0: 80518538 in 10 secs
  Cpus 4, interleave 2 delay 0: 89115148 in 10 secs <<< + 8.7%

i3, with 2 cores and with hyperthreading enabled.  Interleave 2 in order
use first the full cores.  HT partially hides the delay from cacheline
trashing, thus the improvement is "only" 8.7% if 4 threads are running.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 ipc/sem.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct sem {
 	int	sempid;		/* pid of last operation */
 	spinlock_t	lock;	/* spinlock for fine-grained semtimedop */
 	struct list_head sem_pending; /* pending single-sop operations */
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 /* One queue for each sleeping process in the system. */
 struct sem_queue {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ