linux-kernel - [ 32/69] ipc: close open coded spin lock calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131016174316.818840087@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:44:41 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [ 32/69] ipc: close open coded spin lock calls

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>

commit cf9d5d78d05bca96df7618dfc3a5ee4414dcae58 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 ipc/msg.c  |    2 +-
 ipc/sem.c  |   14 +++++++-------
 ipc/shm.c  |    4 ++--
 ipc/util.h |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int newque(struct ipc_namespace *
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msq->q_receivers);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msq->q_senders);
 
-	spin_unlock(&msq->q_perm.lock);
+	ipc_unlock_object(&msq->q_perm);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return msq->q_perm.id;
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static inline int sem_lock(struct sem_ar
 		 * their critical section while the array lock is held.
 		 */
  lock_array:
-		spin_lock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+		ipc_lock_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 		for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) {
 			struct sem *sem = sma->sem_base + i;
 			spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static inline int sem_lock(struct sem_ar
 static inline void sem_unlock(struct sem_array *sma, int locknum)
 {
 	if (locknum == -1) {
-		spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+		ipc_unlock_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 	} else {
 		struct sem *sem = sma->sem_base + locknum;
 		spin_unlock(&sem->lock);
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace
 	int i;
 
 	/* Free the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.  */
-	assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+	ipc_assert_locked_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(un, tu, &sma->list_id, list_id) {
 		list_del(&un->list_id);
 		spin_lock(&un->ulp->lock);
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int semctl_setval(struct ipc_name
 
 	curr = &sma->sem_base[semnum];
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+	ipc_assert_locked_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 	list_for_each_entry(un, &sma->list_id, list_id)
 		un->semadj[semnum] = 0;
 
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namesp
 		for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
 			sma->sem_base[i].semval = sem_io[i];
 
-		assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+		ipc_assert_locked_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 		list_for_each_entry(un, &sma->list_id, list_id) {
 			for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
 				un->semadj[i] = 0;
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(
 	new->semid = semid;
 	assert_spin_locked(&ulp->lock);
 	list_add_rcu(&new->list_proc, &ulp->list_proc);
-	assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+	ipc_assert_locked_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 	list_add(&new->list_id, &sma->list_id);
 	un = new;
 
@@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		}
 
 		/* remove un from the linked lists */
-		assert_spin_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
+		ipc_assert_locked_object(&sma->sem_perm);
 		list_del(&un->list_id);
 
 		spin_lock(&ulp->lock);
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_l
 static inline void shm_lock_by_ptr(struct shmid_kernel *ipcp)
 {
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	spin_lock(&ipcp->shm_perm.lock);
+	ipc_lock_object(&ipcp->shm_perm);
 }
 
 static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int newseg(struct ipc_namespace *
 	ns->shm_tot += numpages;
 	error = shp->shm_perm.id;
 
-	spin_unlock(&shp->shm_perm.lock);
+	ipc_unlock_object(&shp->shm_perm);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return error;
 
--- a/ipc/util.h
+++ b/ipc/util.h
@@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ static inline void ipc_assert_locked_obj
 static inline void ipc_lock_by_ptr(struct kern_ipc_perm *perm)
 {
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	spin_lock(&perm->lock);
+	ipc_lock_object(perm);
 }
 
 static inline void ipc_unlock(struct kern_ipc_perm *perm)
 {
-	spin_unlock(&perm->lock);
+	ipc_unlock_object(perm);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/