[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016155730.7fd55ac5@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:57:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>,
"Li, Zhuangzhi" <zhuangzhi.li@...el.com>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove WARN_ON(in_nmi()) from vmalloc_fault
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:36:32 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Ah but we have an in_interrupt() check in context_tracking_user_enter() that protects
> > us against that.
>
> Here you are relying on the exception being treated as an interrupt,
> correct?
I don't think so. It's relying on nmi_enter() also makes in_interrupt()
return true.
Like I said before. An NMI interrupting userspace should be no
different than an interrupt interrupting userspace. They both can
trigger vmalloc faults, and we should be able to deal with it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists