lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:10:34 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Maxime Jayat <maxime@...isandeveloppeur.fr>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > 
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got conflicts in
> > > > 
> > > > 	net/netfilter/xt_set.c
> > > > 
> > > > caused by commits 3f79410 (treewide: Fix common typo in "identify") and
> > > > bd3129f (netfilter: ipset: order matches and targets separatedly in
> > > > xt_set.c).
> > > > 
> > > > I fixed them up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
> > > > good.
> > > 
> > > I don't really get it: patch bd3129f was part of a patchset, which was 
> > > applied to net-next and there it was complete.
> > > 
> > > There's none of the patchset in question in linux-next, so what's the 
> > > trivial tree? Where's lost what?
> 
> To Jozsef: David collects all the networking patches in net-next until
> Linus' merge window opens, that's why you don't see your patches in
> linux-next. It seems Jiri merges this trivial tree (which indeed
> contains your net-next patches already) to linux-next.
> 
> > > [The patch below doesn't look good, because it should contain the removed 
> > > part for the revision 1 match due to the reordering in the file.]
> > 
> > This is just a super-simple conflict between
> > 
> > 	https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=bd3129f
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > 	https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial.git/diff/net/netfilter/xt_set.c?h=for-next&id=3f79410c7c
> > 
> > I don't think it needs any special handling, do you? I can of course drop 
> > the respective hunk from my tree and let you handle it in net-next if you 
> > wish.
> 
> Please, don't drop it, I think Jozsef got confused by the handling of
> your trivial tree.
 
I was confused mainly because Thierry sent just the relevant part and I 
expected a full patch :-). So it's just fine.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, kadlecsik.jozsef@...ner.mta.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ