[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016210319.GI10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:03:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
eranian@...gle.com, jmario@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip()
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So avoid having to call copy_from_user_nmi() for every instruction.
> > Since we already limit the max basic block size, we can easily
> > pre-allocate a piece of memory to copy the entire thing into in one
> > go.
>
> It would be better/more generic if you split copy_from_user_nmi() into
> init() copy() end()
>
> (and some state that checks if the underlying page changes)
>
> Then first you don't need the buffer and it could be also
> be applied to the other cases, like the stack unwinding,
> where copying everything is likely too slow.
You'd need to make an iterator interface because of the kmap_atomic crap
needed for 32bit.
But yes, something like that might work, it shouldn't be that hard to
cobble on top of that GUP patch I send out the other day.
The only real nasty part is where an instruction straddles a page
boundary, in that case the iterator stuff fails to be fully transparant
and you need a temp copy of sorts.
Anyway; if you want to have a go at this, feel free.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists