[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016213005.GL10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:30:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:51:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
>
> include/linux/wait.h
>
> caused by commits 1ab2460 (wait: add wait_event_cmd()) and fb869b6
> (sched/wait: Clean up wait.h details a bit).
>
> I've cleaned it up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
> good.
> +#define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
> +do { \
> + DEFINE_WAIT(__wait); \
> + \
> + for (;;) { \
> + prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
> + if (condition) \
> + break; \
> + cmd1; \
> + schedule(); \
> + cmd2; \
> + } \
> + finish_wait(&wq, &__wait); \
> +} while (0)
Ideally we'd write the new thing like:
#define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
(void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \
cmd1; schedule(); cmd2)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists