linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LSM: ModPin LSM for module loading restrictions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <525F083D.8060502@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:42:21 -0700
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	keescook@...omium.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com
CC:	jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: ModPin LSM for module loading restrictions

On 10/16/2013 1:47 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Kees Cook wrote:
>> Any update on this? It'd be nice to have it in linux-next.
> What was the conclusion at LSS about multiple concurrent LSM support?
> If we agreed to merge multiple concurrent LSM support, there will be nothing to
> prevent this module from merging.
>
Yeah.

The conclusion was that it needs to be staged because it's
too much to swallow all at once. I can see that. It's going
to be a lot of work to rearrange and rebase. That's a chunk
of time I don't expect to have for a while. It looks good
to happen, but don't hold supper for me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/