[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNoMwu6Gi3kWfz=6dm+nq=+3hFyRQGQkQZRsZ46X_ACFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:40:11 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...dia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: scsiglue: Changing the command result
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> USB storage maybe just has to say that the abort occurred. By setting the
>> US_FLIDX_TIMED_OUT bit USB storage is getting signaled that the reason was
>> time out and the command is being aborted.
>
> No. By setting the US_FLIDX_TIMED_OUT bit, usb-storage indicates that
> the command was aborted. This doesn't indicate anything about the
> reason for the abort. (Maybe this bit's name wasn't chosen very well.)
>
>> Now, it's arguable whether to change the implication of US_FLIDX_TIMED_OUT
>> bit for scsi - USB storage bridge or for entire usb storage
>
> I don't understand this. What's the difference between "scsi - USB
> storage bridge" and "entire usb storage"? Aren't they the same thing?
>
>> Or maybe scsi has
>> decided to abort so it should override the result.
>
> Of course the SCSI midlayer has decided to abort. That's the only way
> this bit can get set. But usb-storage doesn't know why SCSI decided to
> abort.
usb-storage may know if it is caused by timeout via .eh_timed_out callback
if it wants to know.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists