| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <525F8A48.9020007@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:57:12 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / power: Drop automaitc resume of power resource
dependent devices
On 10/16/2013 09:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The mechanism causing devices depending on a given power resource
> (that is, devices that can be in D0 only if that power resource is
> on) to be resumed automatically when the power resource is turned
> on (and their "inferred" power state becomes D0 as a result) is
> inherently racy and in fact unnecessary.
>
> It is racy, because if the power resources is turned on and then
> immediately off, the device resume triggered by the first transition
> to "on" may still happen, causing the power resource to be turned
> on again. That again will trigger the "resume of dependent devices"
> mechanism, but if the devices in question are not in use, they will
> be suspended in the meantime causing the power resource to be turned
> off. However, the "resume of dependent devices" will next resume
> them again and so on. In some cases (USB port PM in particular) that
> leads to an endless busy loop of flipping the resource on and off
> continuously.
>
> It is needless, because whoever turns a power resource on will most
> likely turn it off at some point and the devices that go into "D0"
> as a result of turning it on will then go back into D3cold.
> Moreover, turning all power resources a device needs to go into
> D0 is not sufficient for a full transition into D0 in general.
> Namely, _PS0 may need to be executed in addition to that in some
> cases. This means that the whole rationale of the "resume of
> dependent devices" mechanism was incorrect to begin with and it's
> best to remove it entirely.
With this patch, your previous patch could also be applied now:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/14/173
[PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Drop two functions that are not used any more
And the following ATA patch at the same time:
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ata: acpi: remove power dependent device handling
Previously, we want the SCSI device corrsponding to ATA device gets
runtime resumed when the power resource for that ATA device is turned
on by some other device, so we added the SCSI device to the dependent
device list of the ATA device's ACPI node. Since now we decided this
behavior is troublesome and hard to avoid race, this behavior has been
dropped. This patch cleans up the corresponding code in ATA ACPI layer.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 14 --------------
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 3 ---
drivers/ata/libata.h | 4 ----
3 files changed, 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index 4ba8b04..ab714d2 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -1035,17 +1035,3 @@ void ata_acpi_on_disable(struct ata_device *dev)
{
ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev);
}
-
-void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev)
-{
- acpi_handle handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev);
- if (handle)
- acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(handle, &dev->sdev->sdev_gendev);
-}
-
-void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev)
-{
- acpi_handle handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev);
- if (handle)
- acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(handle, &dev->sdev->sdev_gendev);
-}
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 97a0cef..db6dfcf 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -3679,7 +3679,6 @@ void ata_scsi_scan_host(struct ata_port *ap, int sync)
if (!IS_ERR(sdev)) {
dev->sdev = sdev;
scsi_device_put(sdev);
- ata_scsi_acpi_bind(dev);
} else {
dev->sdev = NULL;
}
@@ -3767,8 +3766,6 @@ static void ata_scsi_remove_dev(struct ata_device *dev)
struct scsi_device *sdev;
unsigned long flags;
- ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(dev);
-
/* Alas, we need to grab scan_mutex to ensure SCSI device
* state doesn't change underneath us and thus
* scsi_device_get() always succeeds. The mutex locking can
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
index eeeb778..45b5ab3 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
@@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ extern void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t state);
extern void ata_acpi_bind_port(struct ata_port *ap);
extern void ata_acpi_bind_dev(struct ata_device *dev);
extern acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *dev);
-extern void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev);
-extern void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev);
#else
static inline void ata_acpi_dissociate(struct ata_host *host) { }
static inline int ata_acpi_on_suspend(struct ata_port *ap) { return 0; }
@@ -133,8 +131,6 @@ static inline void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap,
pm_message_t state) { }
static inline void ata_acpi_bind_port(struct ata_port *ap) {}
static inline void ata_acpi_bind_dev(struct ata_device *dev) {}
-static inline void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev) {}
-static inline void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev) {}
#endif
/* libata-scsi.c */
--
1.8.4.39.ga0d3f10
Thanks,
Aaron
>
> Reported-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/power.c | 100 ---------------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 99 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> @@ -59,16 +59,9 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("power");
> #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON 0x01
> #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN 0xFF
>
> -struct acpi_power_dependent_device {
> - struct list_head node;
> - struct acpi_device *adev;
> - struct work_struct work;
> -};
> -
> struct acpi_power_resource {
> struct acpi_device device;
> struct list_head list_node;
> - struct list_head dependent;
> char *name;
> u32 system_level;
> u32 order;
> @@ -233,32 +226,6 @@ static int acpi_power_get_list_state(str
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void acpi_power_resume_dependent(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> - struct acpi_device *adev;
> - int state;
> -
> - dep = container_of(work, struct acpi_power_dependent_device, work);
> - adev = dep->adev;
> - if (acpi_power_get_inferred_state(adev, &state))
> - return;
> -
> - if (state > ACPI_STATE_D0)
> - return;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
> - pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> - pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -}
> -
> static int __acpi_power_on(struct acpi_power_resource *resource)
> {
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> @@ -283,14 +250,8 @@ static int acpi_power_on_unlocked(struct
> resource->name));
> } else {
> result = __acpi_power_on(resource);
> - if (result) {
> + if (result)
> resource->ref_count--;
> - } else {
> - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node)
> - schedule_work(&dep->work);
> - }
> }
> return result;
> }
> @@ -390,52 +351,6 @@ static int acpi_power_on_list(struct lis
> return result;
> }
>
> -static void acpi_power_add_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource *resource,
> - struct acpi_device *adev)
> -{
> - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node)
> - if (dep->adev == adev)
> - goto out;
> -
> - dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dep)
> - goto out;
> -
> - dep->adev = adev;
> - INIT_WORK(&dep->work, acpi_power_resume_dependent);
> - list_add_tail(&dep->node, &resource->dependent);
> -
> - out:
> - mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> -}
> -
> -static void acpi_power_remove_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource *resource,
> - struct acpi_device *adev)
> -{
> - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> - struct work_struct *work = NULL;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node)
> - if (dep->adev == adev) {
> - list_del(&dep->node);
> - work = &dep->work;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> -
> - if (work) {
> - cancel_work_sync(work);
> - kfree(dep);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static struct attribute *attrs[] = {
> NULL,
> };
> @@ -524,8 +439,6 @@ static void acpi_power_expose_hide(struc
>
> void acpi_power_add_remove_device(struct acpi_device *adev, bool add)
> {
> - struct acpi_device_power_state *ps;
> - struct acpi_power_resource_entry *entry;
> int state;
>
> if (adev->wakeup.flags.valid)
> @@ -535,16 +448,6 @@ void acpi_power_add_remove_device(struct
> if (!adev->power.flags.power_resources)
> return;
>
> - ps = &adev->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0];
> - list_for_each_entry(entry, &ps->resources, node) {
> - struct acpi_power_resource *resource = entry->resource;
> -
> - if (add)
> - acpi_power_add_dependent(resource, adev);
> - else
> - acpi_power_remove_dependent(resource, adev);
> - }
> -
> for (state = ACPI_STATE_D0; state <= ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT; state++)
> acpi_power_expose_hide(adev,
> &adev->power.states[state].resources,
> @@ -882,7 +785,6 @@ int acpi_add_power_resource(acpi_handle
> acpi_init_device_object(device, handle, ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER,
> ACPI_STA_DEFAULT);
> mutex_init(&resource->resource_lock);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->dependent);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->list_node);
> resource->name = device->pnp.bus_id;
> strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_POWER_DEVICE_NAME);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists