linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 5/8] ASoC: sgtl5000: Revise the bugs about the sgt15000 codec.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131017121721.43e1b34b@ipc1.ka-ro>
Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:17:21 +0200
From:	Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To:	Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
Cc:	<r65073@...escale.com>, <timur@...i.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>, <r64188@...escale.com>,
	<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <rob@...dley.net>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.de>,
	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	<oskar@...ra.com>, <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, <b42378@...escale.com>,
	<b18965@...escale.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 5/8] ASoC: sgtl5000: Revise the bugs about the
 sgt15000 codec.

Hi,

Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com> wrote:
> When the CONFIG_REGULATOR is disabled there will be some warnings
> printed out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> index 1f4093f..4e2e4c9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> @@ -883,14 +883,19 @@ static int ldo_regulator_register(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
>  				struct regulator_init_data *init_data,
>  				int voltage)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SGTL5000
> +	return 0;
> +#else
>  	dev_err(codec->dev, "this setup needs regulator support in the kernel\n");
>  	return -EINVAL;
> +#endif
>
This looks wrong to me, as this will disable the error for unsolicited
platforms in a multi arch kernel!

>  static int ldo_regulator_remove(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
>  #endif
>  
Why do you add an extra empty line here?


Lothar Waßmann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info@...o-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/