linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] ACPI, APEI, CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error output format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:27:38 -0300
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	joe@...ches.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	arozansk@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] ACPI, APEI,
 CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error output format

Em Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:24:10 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:56:05AM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> > Keep up only the most important fields for memory error
> > reporting. The detail information will be moved to perf/trace
> > interface.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>

Considering the suggested fixes below:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>

> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> > index b1a8a55..f5bc227 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/aer.h>
> >  
> > +#define INDENT_SP	" "
> > +#define HW_CE_INFO \
> > +	"Above error has been corrected by h/w and no further action required"
> 
> Leftover?
> 
> 
> > +	if (severity != CPER_SEV_FATAL)
> > +		printk("%s%s\n", pfx,
> > +		       "Above error has been corrected by h/w "
> > +		       "and require no further action");
> 
> Let's write it out and correct grammar:
> 
> "Above error has been corrected by the hardware and requires no further action."
> 
> Thanks.
> 


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/