| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:13:32 -0300
From: Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: kernel-br <kernel-br@...glegroups.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
"moderated list:SOUND" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: pci: emu10k1: code refactoring and casting removal
2013/10/17 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>:
> At Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:11:21 -0300,
> Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>>
>> Partially restructures _snd_emu10k1_audigy_init_efx() and
>> _snd_emu10k1_init_efx() functions.
>>
>> Removes useless casting (void *) from value returned by kcalloc;
>> see Documentation/CodingStyle, Chap 14.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
>> ---
>> sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
>> index 0275209..afd4691 100644
>> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
>> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
>> @@ -1182,15 +1182,20 @@ static int _snd_emu10k1_audigy_init_efx(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
>> u32 *gpr_map;
>> mm_segment_t seg;
>>
>> - if ((icode = kzalloc(sizeof(*icode), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL ||
>> - (icode->gpr_map = (u_int32_t __user *)
>> - kcalloc(512 + 256 + 256 + 2 * 1024, sizeof(u_int32_t),
>> - GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL ||
>> - (controls = kcalloc(SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS,
>> - sizeof(*controls), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) {
>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto __err;
>> - }
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + icode = kzalloc(sizeof(*icode), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!icode)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + icode->gpr_map = (__user) kcalloc(512 + 256 + 256 + 2 * 1024,
>> + sizeof(u_int32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!icode->gpr_map)
>> + goto __err_gpr;
>> + controls = kcalloc(SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS,
>> + sizeof(*controls), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!controls)
>> + goto __err_ctrls;
>> +
>> gpr_map = (u32 __force *)icode->gpr_map;
>>
>> icode->tram_data_map = icode->gpr_map + 512;
>> @@ -1741,12 +1746,12 @@ A_OP(icode, &ptr, iMAC0, A_GPR(var), A_GPR(var), A_GPR(vol), A_EXTIN(input))
>> emu->support_tlv = 0; /* clear again */
>> snd_leave_user(seg);
>>
>> - __err:
>> +__err:
>> kfree(controls);
>> - if (icode != NULL) {
>> - kfree((void __force *)icode->gpr_map);
>> - kfree(icode);
>> - }
>> +__err_ctrls:
>> + kfree((void __force *)icode->gpr_map);
>> +__err_gpr:
>> + kfree(icode);
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1813,18 +1818,26 @@ static int _snd_emu10k1_init_efx(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
>> u32 *gpr_map;
>> mm_segment_t seg;
>>
>> - if ((icode = kzalloc(sizeof(*icode), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - if ((icode->gpr_map = (u_int32_t __user *)
>> - kcalloc(256 + 160 + 160 + 2 * 512, sizeof(u_int32_t),
>> - GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL ||
>> - (controls = kcalloc(SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS,
>> - sizeof(struct snd_emu10k1_fx8010_control_gpr),
>> - GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL ||
>> - (ipcm = kzalloc(sizeof(*ipcm), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) {
>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto __err;
>> - }
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + icode = kzalloc(sizeof(*icode), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!icode)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + icode->gpr_map = (__user) kcalloc(256 + 160 + 160 + 2 * 512,
>> + sizeof(u_int32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!icode->gpr_map)
>> + goto __err_gpr;
>> +
>> + controls = kcalloc(SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS,
>> + sizeof(struct snd_emu10k1_fx8010_control_gpr),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!controls)
>> + goto __err_ctrls;
>> +
>> + ipcm = kzalloc(sizeof(*ipcm), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ipcm)
>> + goto __err_ipcm;
>> +
>> gpr_map = (u32 __force *)icode->gpr_map;
>>
>> icode->tram_data_map = icode->gpr_map + 256;
>> @@ -2335,14 +2348,8 @@ static int _snd_emu10k1_init_efx(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
>> for (z = 0; z < 16; z++)
>> OP(icode, &ptr, iACC3, FXBUS2(z), C_00000000, C_00000000, EXTIN(z));
>> }
>> -
>>
>> - if (gpr > tmp) {
>> - snd_BUG();
>> - err = -EIO;
>> - goto __err;
>> - }
>> - if (i > SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS) {
>> + if (gpr > tmp || i > SND_EMU10K1_GPR_CONTROLS) {
>> snd_BUG();
>
> In that way, you can't distinguish which condition triggered the bug
> (it could be shown in WARN() called in snd_BUG() in the original
> version), so this is a functional change. Avoid it in a clean up
> patch.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
Takashi, I actually thought that that change was a cleanup. :) But
ok, now I see the reason (tracing)
What about using this instead snd_BUG?
snd_printd(KERN_WARN "BUG?\ngpr: %d, i: %d", gpr, i);
It prints file, line and we can put the data. I really want to reduce
repeated code.
Regards,
Geyslan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists