[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017121135.GK18765@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:11:35 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] arm64: move encode_insn_immediate() from module.c
to insn.c
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:19:36AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>
> Function encode_insn_immediate() will be used by other instruction
> manipulate related functions, so move it into insn.c and rename it
> as aarch64_insn_encode_immediate().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 14 ++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/module.c | 152 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> index fc439b9..d62b601 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,18 @@ enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class {
> * system instructions */
> };
>
> +enum aarch64_insn_imm_type {
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MOVK,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_16,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_12,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_9,
> + AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MAX
> +};
> +
> #define __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(abbr, mask, val) \
> static __always_inline bool aarch64_insn_is_##abbr(u32 code) \
> { return (code & (mask)) == (val); } \
> @@ -80,6 +92,8 @@ static __always_inline void aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn)
> }
>
> enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
> +u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
> + u32 insn, u64 imm);
> bool aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn);
>
> int aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> index 8dd5fbe..344d23ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
> @@ -147,3 +147,61 @@ int __kprobes aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
> + u32 insn, u64 imm)
> +{
> + u32 immlo, immhi, lomask, himask, mask;
> + int shift;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case AARCH64_INSN_IMM_MOVK:
> + mask = BIT(16) - 1;
> + shift = 5;
> + break;
This is just AARCH64_INSN_IMM_16 now that we're not dealing with MOV
relocations. You can kill INSN_IMM_MOVK in the enum.
The rest of the patch looks fine.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists