[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017122922.69b41b11@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:29:22 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:30:05 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:51:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> >
> > include/linux/wait.h
> >
> > caused by commits 1ab2460 (wait: add wait_event_cmd()) and fb869b6
> > (sched/wait: Clean up wait.h details a bit).
> >
> > I've cleaned it up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
> > good.
>
> > +#define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
> > +do { \
> > + DEFINE_WAIT(__wait); \
> > + \
> > + for (;;) { \
> > + prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
> > + if (condition) \
> > + break; \
> > + cmd1; \
> > + schedule(); \
> > + cmd2; \
> > + } \
> > + finish_wait(&wq, &__wait); \
> > +} while (0)
>
> Ideally we'd write the new thing like:
>
> #define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
> (void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \
> cmd1; schedule(); cmd2)
>
Oooo.. that looks much nicer. I'll make it look like that before it goes
upstream.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists