[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000141c704b634-d1e47864-686f-40a9-b42e-cd5416dec367-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:24:36 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmod: Run usermodehelpers only on cpus allowed for
kthreadd
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > - /* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent keventd(). */
> > - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_all_mask);
> > + /* We can run anywhere kthreadd can run */
> > + set_kthreadd_affinity();
>
> If you really want your isolated CPUs to be undisturbed, you need this affinity to
> be set before the creation of this usermode helper. Otherwise it's going to run to any random
> place before you call the above function.
>
> Is there now way to control the kworker affinity which create this usermode helpers threads
> instead?
The invocation is coming from keventd so the affinity seems to be set to
a different cpu before we get the thread moved.
A tsc loop is running on the processor that gets hit by the usermodehelper spawns.
We see spawning by the tty notifier (when typing on a vt) as well as by a
mellanox driver (periodically).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists