[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017164331.GA2896@katana>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:46:14 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sound/soc/atmel: don't use
devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() in probe
> > > Applied, thanks. Please use subject lines appropriate to the subsystem.
>
> > That's quite a nut to crack with a generated patch series running over
> > the whole tree. I wonder if it is really worth the effort?
>
> I think it's probably worth the effort to add something to put rules for
> these things in MAINTAINERS, it'd cover 90% of cases. If you're sending
> only one of a big series with a subject line that won't pattern match
> that's a good way to get stuff dropped on the floor.
On the other hand, MAINTAINERS information gets overlooked and/or could
get stale. Thinking about it again, it is probably less work (at least
for me with i2c) to create a git-hook fixing the subject line than to
always nag people.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists