[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017030512.GA21327@teo>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:05:12 -0700
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, vmpressure: add high level
Hello David,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:43:55PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> Vmpressure has two important levels: medium and critical. Medium is
> defined at 60% and critical is defined at 95%.
>
> We have a customer who needs a notification at a higher level than medium,
> which is slight to moderate reclaim activity, and before critical to start
> throttling incoming requests to save memory and avoid oom.
>
> This patch adds the missing link: a high level defined at 80%.
>
> In the future, it would probably be better to allow the user to specify an
> integer ratio for the notification rather than relying on arbitrarily
> specified levels.
Does the customer need to differentiate the two levels (medium and high),
or the customer only interested in this (80%) specific level?
In the latter case, instead of adding a new level I would vote for adding
a [sysfs] knob for modifying medium level's threshold.
Thanks,
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists