[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017141957.GE14104@ns203013.ovh.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:19:57 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: srinivas kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
Cc: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart MENEFY <stuart.menefy@...com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Stephen GALLIMORE <stephen.gallimore@...com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] i2c: busses: i2c-st: Add ST I2C controller
On 10:33 Thu 17 Oct , srinivas kandagatla wrote:
> On 17/10/13 08:27, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
> > ...
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +static struct of_device_id st_i2c_match[] = {
> >>> >> + { .compatible = "st,comms-ssc-i2c", },
> >> > the rules is to put the first soc that use the ip in the compatible
> >> > as st,sti7100-scc-i2c
> > Ok. There are no plans to upstream the SH4 platforms, it will only
> > remains in stlinux.com.
> > Maybe I can set the first ARM platform (STiH415)?
> > That would give st,stih415-ssc-i2c.
> NAK, for st,stih415-ssc-i2c naming.
>
> IMO, this makes sense when the same IP integration done on different SOC
> changes slightly/very differently.
>
> But in this case the "comms" IP remains unchanged across all the SOCs.
>
> I would still prefer "st,comms-ssc-i2c", allowing a single device driver
> to match against several SoCs. ST "comms" IP it is integrated across all
> the STi series of SoCs, so we don't want to add new entry in compatible
> for every new SOC.
you never need this you always the first SoC that's all
see other bindings on at91 as example sorry NACK
Best Regards,
J.
>
>
> Thanks,
> srini
>
> >
> > Thanks for the review,
> > Maxime
> >
> >> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists