[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaGg+XdCWSp4yjWTFxXjhj8a+_dFwpT+B_H+GQ_CWZ50-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:15:43 -0700
From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] clk: tegra: simplify periph clock data
Hi Peter,
> @@ -2346,6 +2247,9 @@ static void __init tegra114_clock_init(struct device_node *np)
> if (tegra114_osc_clk_init(clk_base) < 0)
> return;
>
> + if (tegra_clk_set_periph_banks(5) < 0)
Maybe it would be better to have a #define for this (e.g.
TEGRAxxx_CLK_PERIPH_BANKS)? Same goes for t20 and t30.
> /* Global data of Tegra CPU CAR ops */
> static struct tegra_cpu_car_ops dummy_car_ops;
> struct tegra_cpu_car_ops *tegra_cpu_car_ops = &dummy_car_ops;
>
> +int *periph_clk_enb_refcnt;
This changes seems unrelated. Perhaps it should go in the one that
makes the common periph_clk_enb_refcnt?
Thanks,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists