linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] init: make init failures more explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:20:54 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
	janne.karhunen@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] init: make init failures more explicit

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Michael Opdenacker
<michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> +               pr_err("Starting init: %s exists but couldn't execute it (error: %d - see errno-base.h and errno.h)\n",

IMHO the "- see errno-base.h and errno.h" is a bit overkill.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/