linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52612BF1.30001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:09:13 +0530
From:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	bp@...en8.de, joe@...ches.com, m.chehab@...sung.com
CC:	arozansk@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info

On 10/18/2013 01:53 PM, Chen, Gong wrote:
> To prepare for the following patches and make related
> definition more clear, update some definitions about CPER.
>
> v2 -> v1: Update some more definitions suggested by Boris
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h | 12 ++++----
>   drivers/acpi/apei/cper.c          | 58 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c          | 54 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>   include/acpi/actbl1.h             | 14 +++++-----
>   include/acpi/ghes.h               |  2 +-
>   include/linux/cper.h              |  2 +-
>   6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h
> index f220d64..21ba34a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h
> @@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ struct dentry;
>   struct dentry *apei_get_debugfs_dir(void);
>
>   #define apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, section)			\
> -	for (section = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);	\
> +	for (section = (struct acpi_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);	\
>   	     (void *)section - (void *)estatus < estatus->data_length;	\
>   	     section = (void *)(section+1) + section->error_data_length)
>
> -static inline u32 apei_estatus_len(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> +static inline u32 cper_estatus_len(struct acpi_generic_status *estatus)
>   {
>   	if (estatus->raw_data_length)
>   		return estatus->raw_data_offset + \
> @@ -135,10 +135,10 @@ static inline u32 apei_estatus_len(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>   		return sizeof(*estatus) + estatus->data_length;
>   }
>
> -void apei_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
> -			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus);
> -int apei_estatus_check_header(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus);
> -int apei_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus);
> +void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
> +			const struct acpi_generic_status *estatus);
> +int cper_estatus_check_header(const struct acpi_generic_status *estatus);
> +int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_generic_status *estatus);

As stated previously, I am not convinced this makes sense since these 
functions act on ACPI stuctures.

- Naveen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/