| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <b2f8d731c817a5bd72842095d18eab81a63a6de4.1382103344.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:10:15 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl, andrew@...n.ch
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem
We have per-CPU cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use
all of them. We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can
actually make this rwsem per policy instead.
This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations
are also avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing
policy->cpu, etc.
Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
I thought I should send it formally as well. Though Andrew hasn't given his
tested by until now. Rebased over your bleeding-edge branch.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 110 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 ++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index ec391d7..3f03dcb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -48,47 +48,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
#endif
/*
- * cpu_policy_rwsem is a per CPU reader-writer semaphore designed to cure
- * all cpufreq/hotplug/workqueue/etc related lock issues.
- *
- * The rules for this semaphore:
- * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
- * do a down_read on this semaphore.
- * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
- * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
- * mode before doing so.
- *
- * Additional rules:
- * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
- * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
- * - Lock should not be held across
- * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rw_semaphore, cpu_policy_rwsem);
-
-#define lock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void lock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- down_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-lock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-lock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-#define unlock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void unlock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-unlock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-unlock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-/*
* rwsem to guarantee that cpufreq driver module doesn't unload during critical
* sections
*/
@@ -683,14 +642,14 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->show)
ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret;
@@ -711,14 +670,14 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
goto unlock;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
unlock:
@@ -895,7 +854,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -903,7 +862,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = policy;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (has_target) {
if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
@@ -950,6 +909,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
goto err_free_cpumask;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
+ init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
+
return policy;
err_free_cpumask:
@@ -972,19 +933,12 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
if (WARN_ON(cpu == policy->cpu))
return;
- /*
- * Take direct locks as lock_policy_rwsem_write wouldn't work here.
- * Also lock for last cpu is enough here as contention will happen only
- * after policy->cpu is changed and after it is changed, other threads
- * will try to acquire lock for new cpu. And policy is already updated
- * by then.
- */
- down_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu));
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu;
policy->cpu = cpu;
- up_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->last_cpu));
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(policy);
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
@@ -1176,9 +1130,9 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq");
@@ -1229,9 +1183,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
#endif
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
if (!frozen)
@@ -1271,12 +1225,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
if (cpus > 1)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (cpus == 1) {
@@ -1291,10 +1245,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
}
if (!frozen) {
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobj = &policy->kobj;
cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobject_put(kobj);
/*
@@ -1474,19 +1428,22 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
*/
unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
if (cpufreq_disabled() || !cpufreq_driver)
return -ENOENT;
+ BUG_ON(!policy);
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return 0;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
ret_freq = __cpufreq_get(cpu);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret_freq;
@@ -1710,11 +1667,11 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
}
@@ -1945,10 +1902,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
/* end old governor */
if (policy->governor) {
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
/* start new governor */
@@ -1957,10 +1914,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) {
failed = 0;
} else {
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
}
@@ -2006,7 +1963,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
goto no_policy;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
@@ -2033,7 +1990,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
no_policy:
@@ -2190,14 +2147,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_driver);
static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
{
- int cpu;
-
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- init_rwsem(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu));
-
cpufreq_global_kobject = kobject_create();
BUG_ON(!cpufreq_global_kobject);
register_syscore_ops(&cpufreq_syscore_ops);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 0aba2a6c..6b457d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -85,6 +85,20 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
struct list_head policy_list;
struct kobject kobj;
struct completion kobj_unregister;
+
+ /*
+ * The rules for this semaphore:
+ * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
+ * do a down_read on this semaphore.
+ * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
+ * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
+ * mode before doing so.
+ *
+ * Additional rules:
+ * - Lock should not be held across
+ * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ */
+ struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
};
/* Only for ACPI */
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists