linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 Resend 12/34] cpufreq: exynos: Convert to light weight ->target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:29:35 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 Resend 12/34] cpufreq: exynos: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine

This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for this driver.

CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and will pass index to it.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c     | 21 +++------------------
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 21 +++++----------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 3e4af67..9982fcb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
 	freqs.old = policy->cur;
 	freqs.new = target_freq;
 
-	if (freqs.new == freqs.old)
-		goto out;
-
 	/*
 	 * The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper
 	 * old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore
@@ -151,13 +148,9 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-			  unsigned int target_freq,
-			  unsigned int relation)
+static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
-	unsigned int index;
-	unsigned int new_freq;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -165,15 +158,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	if (frequency_locked)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
-					   target_freq, relation, &index)) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
-
-	ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq);
+	ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freq_table[index].frequency);
 
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -247,7 +232,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
 	.flags		= CPUFREQ_STICKY,
 	.verify		= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
-	.target		= exynos_target,
+	.target_index	= exynos_target,
 	.get		= exynos_getspeed,
 	.init		= exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.exit		= cpufreq_generic_exit,
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index 8ae5e29..1bf9b06 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -214,27 +214,17 @@ static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
 	return dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
 }
 
-static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-			  unsigned int target_freq,
-			  unsigned int relation)
+static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 {
-	unsigned int index, tmp;
-	int ret = 0, i;
+	unsigned int tmp;
+	int i;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table;
 
 	mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
 
-	ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
-					   target_freq, relation, &index);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-
 	freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
 	freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
 
-	if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
-		goto out;
-
 	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
 
 	/* Set the target frequency in all C0_3_PSTATE register */
@@ -245,9 +235,8 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 		__raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
 	}
-out:
 	mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -325,7 +314,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
 	.flags		= CPUFREQ_STICKY,
 	.verify		= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
-	.target		= exynos_target,
+	.target_index	= exynos_target,
 	.get		= exynos_getspeed,
 	.init		= exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.exit		= cpufreq_generic_exit,
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/