[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131018154934.GA14794@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:49:34 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>, David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Martin Cermak <mcermak@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: Change uprobe_copy_process() to dup
xol_area
On 10/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, uprobe_copy_process() can not simply do
> __create_xol_area(child, xol_area->vaddr). This could actually work
> but perf_event_mmap() doesn't expect the usage of foreign ->mm. So
> we offload this to task_work_run(), and pass the argument via not
> yet used utask->vaddr.
OK, this patch needs a fix, I'll send v2 in a minute.
> + work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!work)
> + return uprobe_warn(t, "dup xol area");
> +
> + utask->vaddr = mm->uprobes_state.xol_area->vaddr;
Yes, currently utask->return_instances && !uprobes_state.xol_area
is not possible.
> + init_task_work(work, dup_xol_work);
> + task_work_add(t, work, true);
But if dup_xol_work() fails and the child does another fork(), it
can hit area == NULL, so we need to check this.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists