lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:48:01 -0400 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com> To: Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me> Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, keith.busch@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Convert from bio-based to blk-mq v2 On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:14:19PM +0200, Matias Bjorling wrote: > Performance study: > > System: HGST Research NVMe prototype, Haswell i7-4770 3.4Ghz, 32GB 1333Mhz I don't have one of these. Can you provide more details about it, such as: - How many I/O queues does it have? - Are the interrupts correctly bound to the CPUs (for both sets of tests)? The driver isn't allowed to set the irq affinity correctly itself; it can only set a hint and userspace (eg irqbalance) has to set the affinity correctly - Does it support interrupt coalescing? If so, have you managed to do any testing using that feature? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists