linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 08/19] arm/xen: get_dma_ops: return xen_dma_ops if we are running as xen_initial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310181658020.26077@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:59:47 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>, <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/19] arm/xen: get_dma_ops: return xen_dma_ops if we
 are running as xen_initial_domain

On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:46:00PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:22:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Russell,
> > > > are you OK with this patch?
> > > 
> > > Only concern is why the change is soo large.
> > > 
> > > > > -static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *__generic_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> > > > >  		return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> > > > >  	return &arm_dma_ops;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	if (xen_initial_domain())
> > > > > +		return xen_dma_ops;
> > > > > +	else
> > > > > +		return __generic_dma_ops(dev);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > 
> > > What's wrong with:
> > > 
> > >  static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > >  {
> > > +	if (xen_initial_domain())
> > > +		return xen_dma_ops;
> > >  	if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> > >  		return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> > >  	return &arm_dma_ops;
> > >  }
> > 
> > 
> > xen_dma_ops functions might have to call back the native implementation.
> > With the above there is no way for a xen_dma_ops function to get to
> > archdata.dma_ops or arm_dma_ops.
> > This is the reason why this patch introduces __generic_dma_ops.
> 
> Ah, that's fine then, but having that described in the commit message
> would be useful.
> 
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> 
> Thanks.

Thank you. I'll add a note to the commit message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/