linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: remove lagacy clk workarounds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:20:22 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: remove lagacy clk workarounds

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:17:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:47:41AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > > With legacy devices converted to DT and a proper ethernet MAC
> > > workaround, we can now remove the clk workarounds for legacy
> > > devices. While at it, also cleanup the list of includes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > As a follow-up patch for latest mvebu PRs, this patch is based on
> > >  git://git.infradead.org/linux-mvebu.git tags/soc-3.13-2
> > > 
> > > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> > > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/board-dt.c |   42 ++----------------------------------
> > >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied to mvebu/soc
> > 
> 
> Weird: I've tried to do this clean-up myself and my usual tests with network
> built as a module failed somehow. Maybe I missed something and did something
> stupid?
> 
> Of course, I'll re-try and let you all know...

Please do.  You can try mvebu/for-next now. It has this and everything
else we need to test for the merge window.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/