[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaz22N8-9Rg8vR=KGOEL5P6sZm6Hh5PT4Uq381+QmPs7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:43:28 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"pinctl-single.c" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 17 (pinctrl-single.c)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 10/17/13 17:38, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
>> repository below:
>>
>> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
>>
>> A next-20131017 tag is also provided for convenience.
>>
>> One new conflict today but otherwise uneventful. x86_64 allmodconfigs
>> build after each merge but no other build tests were done.
>
> on i386:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c: In function 'pcs_irqdomain_map':
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c:1750:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c:1750:21: error: 'IRQF_VALID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c:1750:34: error: 'IRQF_PROBE' undeclared (first use in this function)
Hmmmm this looks like Tony's baby and the offending patch is
not in the pinctrl tree, I bet he'll have a fix for it in no time.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists