[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131018062908.GD14264@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:29:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: honor ACPI FADT flag indicating absence of a CMOS
RTC
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> We shouldn't be creating a corresponding platform device in that case.
There's a sad lack of context in the changelog, how was it found, does
this address any problem/bug observed in practice, etc?
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- 3.12-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> +++ 3.12-rc5-x86-ACPI-no-RTC/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,11 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
> if (mrst_identify_cpu())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_CMOS_RTC)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +#endif
It might also be prudent to emit a KERN_INFO line telling that we don't
create the device - so that people who suddenly see unexpected breakage or
change in behavior have a chance to see what we've done?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists