[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131019.184919.1292439830365652584.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: geyslan@...il.com
Cc: kernel-br@...glegroups.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: n2_core: insert '!err' condition in else scope
From: Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:42:35 -0300
> 2013/10/19 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> From: "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:09:31 -0300
>>
>>> This patch moves the '!err' condition into the above else scope,
>>> what is more obvious and has the secondary goal of avoid false-positives
>>> in statical analyze tools.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
>>
>> I do not think patches should be applied to satisfy tools if the
>> code is semantically correct.
>
> Yes, Miller, I agree. But as I mentioned:
> ".. and has as the 'secondary' goal of avoid false-positives in
> statical analyze tools."
>
> The 'primary' goal is to not repeat a condition test:
> "This patch moves the '!err' condition into the above else scope, what
> is more obvious ..."
I still do not feel that this change is a net-positive. Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists