[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761stu7rl.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:52:46 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sangjung Woo <sangjung.woo@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] device: Add kernel standard devm_k.alloc functions
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:04:11AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > A handful of boot panics on ARM platforms were bisected to point at
>> > the version of this commit that's in linux-next (commit
>> > 64c862a839a8db2c02bbaa88b923d13e1208919d). Reverting this commit
>> > makes things happy again.
>> >
>> > Upon further digging, it seems that users of devres_alloc() are
>> > relying on the previous behavior of having the memory zero'd which is
>> > no longer the case after $SUBJECT patch. The change below on top of
>> > -next makes these ARM boards happy again.
>>
>> Oops, it should've fixed __devres_alloc() also. Updated patch below.
>
> Can you send this in a format that I can apply it in? It was whitespace
> damaged.
hmm, sorry about that. This one should work, though I wonder if Andrew
should pick this up since I think the patch that causes the breakage
came through his tree.
Kevin
---------------8<----------------------------------------------------
>From a1962ed4a999fb630a48f75a5ecaf84401d5dbfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:41:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] devres: restore zeroing behavior of devres_alloc()
commit 64c862a8 (devres: add kernel standard devm_k.alloc functions) changed
the default behavior of alloc_dr() to no longer zero the allocated memory. However,
only the devm.k.alloc() function were modified to pass in __GFP_ZERO which leaves
any users of devres_alloc() or __devres_alloc() with potentially wrong assumptions
about memory being zero'd upon allocation.
To fix, add __GFP_ZERO to devres_alloc() calls to preserve previous
behavior of zero'ing memory upon allocation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
---
drivers/base/devres.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/devres.c b/drivers/base/devres.c
index 37e67a2..545c4de 100644
--- a/drivers/base/devres.c
+++ b/drivers/base/devres.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ void * __devres_alloc(dr_release_t release, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
{
struct devres *dr;
- dr = alloc_dr(release, size, gfp);
+ dr = alloc_dr(release, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
if (unlikely(!dr))
return NULL;
set_node_dbginfo(&dr->node, name, size);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void * devres_alloc(dr_release_t release, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct devres *dr;
- dr = alloc_dr(release, size, gfp);
+ dr = alloc_dr(release, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
if (unlikely(!dr))
return NULL;
return dr->data;
--
1.8.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists