[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131019133401.GA27798@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:34:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>, kernel-br@...glegroups.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: fix referencing after memory freeing and
refactors code
Steven, et all, sorry for off-topic...
You probably know that kernel/trace/ is not trivial ;) and the fact
that cscope doesn't shows the callers in kernel/trace/trace_events.c
doesn't really help.
Fixed by the patch below, but I am not sure it is fine to uglify the
code to help the buggy tools. Is there any other way?
Oleg.
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 368a4d5..087fff1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ static int system_refcount_dec(struct event_subsystem *system)
struct ftrace_event_file *___n; \
list_for_each_entry_safe(file, ___n, &tr->events, list)
+/* Yes. Twice to not confuse csope */
+#define while_for_each_event_file() \
+ }
#define while_for_each_event_file() \
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists