linux-kernel - Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52640379.8070609@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:23:21 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>>> m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section
>>>> `.note.gnu.build-id'
>>>
>>> I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2.
>>> Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f52a5c15db7d14a534815f27253b001735183
>>> ("m68knommu: clean up linker script").
>>>
>>
>> Kind of. Turns out it requires the following patches.
>>
>> 40c1b9cf (m68k: consolidate the vmlinux.lds linker scripts)
>> ed865e31 (m68k: use non-MMU linker script for ColdFire MMU builds)
>> f84f52a5 (m68knommu: clean up linker script)
>>
>> With those patches applied, all my m68k builds (mmu and nommu) pass with 3.2.
>
> I've queued these up for 3.2.  The first looks quite a big change in
> terms of lines, but most of that is just renaming a file so I think it's
> within the spirit of the stable rules.  The third is also pretty big as
> m68knommu seems so broken in 3.2 that I suppose it is OK.
>
> Ben.
>
Hi Ben,

is that in your patch list yet ? Just wondering, because the latest nommu build still failed.

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/