linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 19/23] ima: defer determining the appraisal hash algorithm for 'ima' template

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1382395388-8108-20-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:43:04 -0400
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/23] ima: defer determining the appraisal hash algorithm for 'ima' template

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>

The same hash algorithm should be used for calculating the file
data hash for the IMA measurement list, as for appraising the file
data integrity.  (The appraise hash algorithm is stored in the
'security.ima' extended attribute.)  The exception is when the
reference file data hash digest, stored in the extended attribute,
is larger than the one supported by the template.  In this case,
the file data hash needs to be calculated twice, once for the
measurement list and, again, for appraisal.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 5e8b1f7..0b11bb4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
+	struct ima_template_desc *template_desc = ima_template_desc_current();
 	char *pathbuf = NULL;
 	const char *pathname = NULL;
 	int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise, _func;
@@ -188,7 +189,10 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
 		goto out_digsig;
 	}
 
-	if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
+	if (strcmp(template_desc->name, IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_NAME) == 0) {
+		if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
+			xattr_ptr = &xattr_value;
+	} else
 		xattr_ptr = &xattr_value;
 
 	rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, xattr_ptr, &xattr_len);
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/