linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] perf ui/progress: Add new helper functions for progress bar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131022130609.GB2124@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:06:09 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] perf ui/progress: Add new helper functions for
 progress bar

Em Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:12:40PM +0000, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:13:24 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:15:37PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>

> >> Introduce ui_progress_setup() and ui_progress__advance() to separate
> >> out from the session logic.  It'll be used by other places in the
> >> upcoming patch.

> > Renaming this from 'perf_progress' to 'ui_progress', as the existing
> > method names implies, and also because this is not perf specific at all
> > :-)

> I'm not sure I understood you correctly.  You're talking about the
> struct perf_progree right?  We already have struct ui_progress for
> saving UI-specific function pointers.  Am I missing something?

Yes, the existing 'struct ui_progress' is not a per instance progress
bar class, but a set of operations that an specific UI sets for use
after some init progress, so it is misnamed, it should be, following
kernel examples, ui_progress_ops, and then ui_progress can be used for
what you called perf_progress.

I'll work on that, enjoy Edinburgh! :-)
 
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/