linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mrst_max3110: fix SPI UART interrupt parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1382471160.205404749@f402.i.mail.ru>
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:46:00 +0400
From:	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
To:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.cz, ning.li@...el.com,
	ivan.gorinov@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mrst_max3110: fix SPI UART interrupt parameters

> The change in the max3110 driver makes the IRQ handling threaded, now
> the handler is called only once per received character. Without that
> change, we had many (more than 100) interrupts per one received
> character.
> 
> Unfortunately, SFI interface does not support IRQ polarity and
> triggering modes, so we have to keep the hacks as hard-coded device
> names and IRQ numbers until we switch to ACPI.
> 
> Edge-triggered IRQ still supported to keep old platforms working.
> Use platform data to pass the irq mode argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gorinov@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Ning <ning.li@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
...
> +++ b/include/linux/serial_max3110.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_SERIAL_MAX3110_H
> +#define _LINUX_SERIAL_MAX3110_H
> +
> +/**
> + * struct plat_max3110 - MAX3110 SPI UART platform data
> + * @irq_edge_trigger: if IRQ is edge triggered
> + *
> + * You should use this structure in your machine description to specify
> + * how the MAX3110 is connected.
> + *
> + */
> +struct plat_max3110 {
> +	int irq_edge_triggered;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> -- 

Is just resource->flags for IRQ can be reused for handle such case?

---