[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131022070256.GA5527@jtlinux>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:02:56 +0200
From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>
Subject: Driver Design Question
Hi List,
I have a design question concerning a device driver. The device in question is
somewhere in between drivers/mfd/timberdale and drivers/ssb. It is mapped
connected via PCI and on PCI Bar 0 there is a table describing which
"sub-devices" are contained in the FPGA as well as where their Memory and IRQ
resources are.
Unlike the timberdale driver, there is no static configuration of the FPGA's
sub-devices, but their number and kind is variable. But luckily we have unique
device-ids for every sub-device, so it is possible to do a PCI/USB like
enumeration.
In my understanding the MFD API, which timberdale uses, isn't tailored to this
Plug'n'Play like behavior. Whereas the I think (virtual) bus concept used by
SSB is much more suited for this kind of devices. But would it be wise to add a
bus only suited to devices manufactured by one vendor, when there is already a
API for such kinds of multi function devices?
Long story short, which would be the preferred way to implement such a driver? At
the point I currently reached I could go in both directions.
I'd appreciate any advice I can get on this topic.
Thanks in advance,
Johannes
P.S.: MFD and SSB maintainers are on CC as I'd really like to hear their opinion
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists