[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131022082159.GA20713@localhost>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:21:59 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix ordering of jumpstack allocation and
table update
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:14:53PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:18:13PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 17:57 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Hi Pablo,
> > >
> >
> > > > We also need fixes for net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c and
> > > > net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c as well. Could you extend this patch
> > > > and resend?
> > >
> > > Sure, I can try, but that's going to require a bit of time to sit down and
> > > look at the shared data, access order, dependencies etc. I'm currently
> > > preparing for Edinburgh, so it might be a while before I get a chance to
> > > extend this.
> >
> > That's basically same code copy/pasted, so it should be relatively easy.
>
> Ok, I took a look and I think I see what you mean: there are just some
> additional consumers of the tables, so there aren't any additional writers
> afaict (at least, net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c uses rw locks so we don't
> have an issue there).
>
> Attempt at an updated patch below.
Applied, thanks Will.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists