[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <830D780E-6D6A-4398-B736-7E1D87C40EF7@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:28:40 -0700
From: Seth Goldberg <seth.goldberg@...cle.com>
To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@....org>
Cc: "Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko"
<phcoder@...il.com>,
The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@....org>,
"keir@....org" <keir@....org>,
"david.woodhouse@...el.com" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>,
"stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ross.philipson@...rix.com" <ross.philipson@...rix.com>,
"jbeulich@...e.com" <jbeulich@...e.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"richard.l.maliszewski@...el.com" <richard.l.maliszewski@...el.com>,
"ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:54:44AM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> On 21.10.2013 23:16, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> Mail is big, I think I got your essential points but I didn't read it whole.
>>>> On 21.10.2013 14:57, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
>>>> that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
>>>> of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2
>>>> implementation calls ExitBootServices() on them just before jumping
>>>> into loaded image. In this situation loaded system could not clearly
>>>> identify reserved memory regions, EFI runtime services regions and others.
>>> Will a multiboot2 tag with whole EFI memory map solve your problem?
>> I added such a tag in documentation and wrote a patch for it (attached).
>
> Thanks. Could you send me a pointer to current multiboot2 protocol docs?
>
>> Awaiting for someone to test it to commit
>
> On first sight it looks quite nice. However, as I know Solaris guys
> prepared similar solution. I am not sure it was discussed with GRUB2
> guys. However, I think that it is worth coordinating both works and
> do not break existing solution if it is possible.
>
> I will try to get more details about Solaris implementation.
It's compatible. Vladimir based this change on the changes we made; we just need to test to verify.
--S
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@....org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists