linux-kernel - Re: [v5][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:27:22 +0800
From:	"“tiejun.chen”" 
	<tiejun.chen@...driver.com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC:	<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

On 10/19/2013 06:57 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 18:28 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>> gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke
>> a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always
>> trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current
>> is blocked for handling those pending exception, then we miss
>> that expected dbcr configuration at last to generate a debug
>> exception.
>
> What do you mean by "the current is blocked"?  Could you explain more
> clearly what lazy EE has to do with MSR_DE and DBCR0?
>

I will go another path to make sure the lazy EE doesn't affect KGDB, so please 
see next version.

Thanks,

Tiejun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/