lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:29:30 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	gleb@...hat.com
Cc:	avi.kivity@...il.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/15] KVM: MMU: check last spte with unawareness of mapping level

The sptes on the middle level should obey these rules:
- they are always writable
- they are not pointing to process's page, so that SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE has
  no chance to be set

So we can check last spte by using PT_WRITABLE_MASK and SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE
that can be got from spte, then we can let is_last_spte() do not depend on
the mapping level anymore

This is important to implement lockless write-protection since only spte is
available at that time

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c         | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c   |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |  6 ++----
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 5b42858..8b96d96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -337,13 +337,13 @@ static int is_rmap_spte(u64 pte)
 	return is_shadow_present_pte(pte);
 }
 
-static int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
+static int is_last_spte(u64 pte)
 {
-	if (level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
-		return 1;
-	if (is_large_pte(pte))
-		return 1;
-	return 0;
+	/*
+	 * All the sptes on the middle level are writable but
+	 * SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE is not set.
+	 */
+	return !(is_writable_pte(pte) && !(pte & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE));
 }
 
 static pfn_t spte_to_pfn(u64 pte)
@@ -2203,7 +2203,7 @@ static bool shadow_walk_okay(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
 static void __shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
 			       u64 spte)
 {
-	if (is_last_spte(spte, iterator->level)) {
+	if (is_last_spte(spte)) {
 		iterator->level = 0;
 		return;
 	}
@@ -2255,15 +2255,14 @@ static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
-			     u64 *spte)
+static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
 {
 	u64 pte;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
 
 	pte = *spte;
 	if (is_shadow_present_pte(pte)) {
-		if (is_last_spte(pte, sp->role.level)) {
+		if (is_last_spte(pte)) {
 			drop_spte(kvm, spte);
 			if (is_large_pte(pte))
 				--kvm->stat.lpages;
@@ -2286,7 +2285,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children(struct kvm *kvm,
 	unsigned i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; ++i)
-		mmu_page_zap_pte(kvm, sp, sp->spt + i);
+		mmu_page_zap_pte(kvm, sp->spt + i);
 }
 
 static void kvm_mmu_put_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
@@ -3068,7 +3067,7 @@ static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
 	}
 
 	sp = page_header(__pa(iterator.sptep));
-	if (!is_last_spte(spte, sp->role.level))
+	if (!is_last_spte(spte))
 		goto exit;
 
 	/*
@@ -4316,7 +4315,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 		local_flush = true;
 		while (npte--) {
 			entry = *spte;
-			mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, spte);
+			mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, spte);
 			if (gentry &&
 			      !((sp->role.word ^ vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role.word)
 			      & mask.word) && rmap_can_add(vcpu))
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
index daff69e..d54e2ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void __mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		fn(vcpu, ent + i, level);
 
 		if (is_shadow_present_pte(ent[i]) &&
-		      !is_last_spte(ent[i], level)) {
+		      !is_last_spte(ent[i])) {
 			struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
 
 			child = page_header(ent[i] & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) || !is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
+	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) || !is_last_spte(*sptep))
 		return;
 
 	gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
 
 static void audit_sptes_have_rmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
 {
-	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
+	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && is_last_spte(*sptep))
 		inspect_spte_has_rmap(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index ad75d77..33f0216 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -809,7 +809,6 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
 {
 	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
-	int level;
 	u64 *sptep;
 
 	vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, gva);
@@ -822,11 +821,10 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
 
 	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
 	for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, gva, iterator) {
-		level = iterator.level;
 		sptep = iterator.sptep;
 
 		sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
-		if (is_last_spte(*sptep, level)) {
+		if (is_last_spte(*sptep)) {
 			pt_element_t gpte;
 			gpa_t pte_gpa;
 
@@ -836,7 +834,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
 			pte_gpa = FNAME(get_level1_sp_gpa)(sp);
 			pte_gpa += (sptep - sp->spt) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
 
-			if (mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, sptep))
+			if (mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sptep))
 				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
 
 			if (!rmap_can_add(vcpu))
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ